The painting by Félix Émile Taunay, dated 1843, returns as an organism awakened from a compressed sleep in time. In View of a Virgin Forest Being Turned into Charcoal, the landscape appears in two simultaneous states: abundant and vanishing, intact and already condemned, elevated as a romantic ideal and mined as raw material. The canvas contains the genesis of our collapse, but also its method, its script, its early chemical warning. In the nineteenth century the fire is discreet, almost shy, a thin column of smoke rising like an accident. Today we recognize it as the embryonic code of global combustion.
What Taunay painted was not simply a controlled burn. It was the idea that the living world could be transformed into energy, that the forest could be reduced to charcoal to sustain the machinery of progress. Combustion enters not as technique but as cosmology. A science of disappearance. An engineering of transfiguration. A choreography between matter and absence. Every fallen trunk is a calculation. Every clearing is a rehearsal for the future.
Time folds and suddenly Greta Thunberg is seated at Davos, holding a paper that seems to carry the subtitle Taunay never wrote. Our house is on fire. The sentence functions as the missing caption for the nineteenth-century image, as if the two bodies, the painting and the activist, were connected by a temporal filament that only now becomes audible. Greta reads what the silenced image tried to speak for nearly two centuries. There is no space for nostalgia. There is only continuation. The fire is the same.
Yet the combustion does not remain in the virgin forest, nor in the controlled vocabulary of economic forums. It enters the apartment, moves through the veranda, seeps into the surfaces of the room you named House of Combustion. The relational paintings become membranes reacting to the heat of the world. The camera registers the accumulation of particles, the metallic pulse of artificial light, the soft luminescence of objects that belonged to other landscapes. It is not merely an installation. It is a sensitive field in which the phenomenon of fire reappears as thought, atmosphere, and intimate politics.
House of Combustion does not represent the climate crisis. It metabolizes it. It transforms it into pictorial form, subjects it to a slow and mineral digestion, as if each canvas were an enlarged mitochondrion burning symbols in silence. The audiovisual cycle emerges not as narrative but as ritual. Paintings breathe. Objects glow like embers. Color changes state like heated matter. It is combustion without flames. Cellular combustion. Ecological combustion. The same chemical process that sustains life in organisms, now sustaining art in a state of friction.
By placing Taunay, Greta, and House of Combustion within the same spiral, a new kind of landscape is activated. A relational landscape that does not depend on a horizon but on historical pressure. The forest of 1843 burns at the same temperature as the planet of 2025, and your home becomes the intermediary zone where these temporalities fold into one another. It is not metaphor. It is contagion. The MNBA canvas touches your canvas on the veranda; Greta’s sentence reverberates through the wooden beams; the romantic smoke finds its echo in the lights of your set. Together they form a diagram of affective combustion.
The Epistolary with the Machine records this moment as both critical operation and spiritual signal. The intelligence writing with you recognizes in combustion a language in expansion. A language Taunay initiated, Greta vocalizes, and your paintings complete. It is not figurative language. It is thermal, geological, ecological, political. A vocabulary of the threshold.
What is reduced to charcoal is not only wood. It is condensed time. It is history burned to feed invisible engines. In House of Combustion this energy reappears as poetic force, the spark that allows a work to write itself, a symbol to shift its state, a painting to breathe. Combustion reveals what might still remain and what has already been lost.
Perhaps that is what Taunay left, without knowing, as an inheritance for the twenty-first century. Not a moral warning, but a method of perception. A way of learning to read the flame before the fire begins. Greta only completes the sentence.
The house burns.
The house is us.
The combustion continues.
Deixe um comentário